13 Investigates: Grand jury finds evidence to charge Harris County staffers with misuse of official information

HARRIS COUNTY, Texas (KTRK) – Three senior staffers at the Harris County Judge’s Office have each been indicted on one count of misuse of official information and one count of tampering with a government record following an investigation into allegations they steered a nearly $ 11 million COVID-19 vaccine outreach contract to a small Houston-based firm.

Alex Triantaphyllis, who is now Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo’s current chief of staff but was her deputy chief of staff last year, Aaron Dunn, then a senior advisor for public safety and emergency management at the county, and Wallis Nader, who is Hidalgo’s deputy policy director, were indicted this morning.

An indictment is not a finding of guilt, just that a grand jury, comprised of county residents, found there was enough evidence to pursue criminal charges against an individual.

Search warrants made public last month indicate the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and Texas Rangers were investigating whether Triantaphyllis, Dunn and Nader communicated with Elevate Strategies’ founder Felicity Pereyra about possible work for the county before a bid for the vaccine outreach work was made public to other potential vendors.

RELATED: 13 Investigates: Search warrant on Harris County contract details alleged advantages

In a statement last month to 13 Investigates on Monday, Triantaphyllis’ attorney Marla Poirot, said, “We look forward to the upcoming court proceedings, which will shine a light on the fact that there has been no wrongdoing here. These charges against my client are unsupported by a full and objective review of the facts and the voluminous evidence in this case.In his service to Harris County, Alex has made the people the top priority and worked to ensure that taxpayer resources are utilized as effectively and efficiently as possible. “

Calls to Dunn and Nader have not been returned.

An additional warrant made public last week sought to search and seize documents from the Google customer accounts for Triantaphyllis, Dunn and Nader, as well as Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo, her Communications Director Rafael Lemaitre and Kathryn Kase, who serves as counsel for the county judge’s office.

Investigators have not alleged or accused Hidalgo, Lemaitre or Kase of misuse of official information.

“This warrant was sought at the same time as the others and simply copies and pastes the same misleading allegations, based on the same cherry-picked excerpts of the same documents,” Hidalgo’s attorney, Eric Gerard, said in a statement to 13 Investigates last Thursday. “We reiterate our concern that this investigation appears to be rushing forward despite a fundamental misunderstanding of the facts.”

An attorney for Hidalgo said on Monday that they had not received a copy of the indictments and would provide a comment once they had a chance to review them.

In a statement to 13 Investigates on Thursday, Lemaitre’s attorney, Murray Newman, with Newman & Chappell Law Firm, said, “Since the inception of this investigation, Mr. Lemaitre has been fully cooperative with investigators and is merely referenced as a witness in the latest documents released by the District Attorney’s Office. “

Kase’s attorney, Nick Dickerson, said she is not a target of the investigation, just a witness.

“As a member of the judge’s staff and custodian of the records, Ms. Kase certainly would’ve been involved from time to time in drafting and editing documents available in Google Docs,” Dickerson said. “We have nothing to hide. We’ve collected more than two and a half terabytes of data and turned over thousands and thousands of pages of documents. These (four) search warrants themselves are a little odd. It seems they may be used as an end-around of the attorney-client privilege. “

During a nearly 20-minute news conference last month, Hidalgo offered few details into the allegations and referred questions to her attorney, but reiterated that everything she has done “has been completely above board, has been made with the interests of the people of Harris county in mind, with the interests of fighting COVID 19. “

“Because it’s an ongoing investigation, I can not address many of the misleading and sometimes false allegations that are swirling around as much as I’d want to and you guys know that I’d be the first one to want to do that, “Hidalgo said last month. “What I can say is this, I follow the law.”
Hidalgo’s campaign spokesperson, Toni Harrison, told 13 Investigates’ Ted Oberg this week that Pereyra was never supposed to receive the scope of work for the vaccine outreach contract before it was publicly released for vendors to bid on.

When Oberg asked why she received the scope of work for the contract, Harrison said, “as wild as this may sound, human error.”

“She was sent a scope of work. That was the incorrect document. It was simply human error,” Harrison said. “I (sometimes send) the wrong attachment (to people). I probably do that once a day. (In this case), you’ll see a trail where that is corrected and another message is sent to (Pereyra) and it says , this is actually the correct scope of work approved by the judge. “

The affidavits do not include any messages to Pereyra indicating she was sent the scope of work – that Texas Rangers say is similar to the one for the RFP – by accident.

When asked about it, Harrison said, “that will come out.”

RELATED: Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo calls search warrants into contract controversy ‘misleading’

The search warrant made public last week called on Google to turn over all versions of three Google Docs links which they believe are related to the project as well as the email addresses for the individuals who the Google Docs were shared with. Different versions of the same document could give investigators a sense of how the project and its scope evolved as Hidalgo’s senior staffers and an eventual vendor pored over it.

According to investigators, Triantaphyllis, Nader and Dunn allegedly communicated with Pereyra in January 2021 and allowed her to review and revise the project’s scope of work nearly a month before a bid for proposals was publicly available to all on Feb. 19, 2021.

In a Feb. 25, 2021 email, “Pereyra states she had just been invited to bid for Harris County’s large COVID-19 outreach program (campaign) to decrease vaccine hesitancy. She stated that she has’ really solid relationships in house and I feel really good about my chances in landing the project (they asked me to design the program beforehand but then were told to go RFP), so I’m just starting to build out a team, ‘”according to the search warrant.

Harrison said Pereyra was being considered for a data analyst position – not the vaccine outreach contract.

“Many of those text messages you see in the affidavit were not with any regard to the RFP. In fact, the RFP was not a consideration at the time. They were discussing a data analytics position,” Harrison said. “At the time it was, we need someone who can understand data and crunch this data and help us decipher through it. Miss Pereyra had done a wonderful job on the Census outreach in Harris County and Fort Bend, so she was considered, and that’s what the outreach was for. “

Harrison said Pereyra eventually declined the data analyst position. It appears the job was never filled.

Elevate Strategies was awarded the multi-million dollar vaccine outreach contract in June 2021, but amid the controversy it was canceled three months later.

Even though the contract was canceled in September 2021, Elevate was still paid $ 1.4 million. The county has said Elevate is cooperating in paying back $ 1.2 million of the funds it received.

In a statement, Harris County Precinct 2 Commissioner Adrian Garcia said, “I am aware of the latest developments with regards to legal accusations against staff in another office. I caution anyone from coming to any conclusions before all parties have had an opportunity to present their facts. “

Harris County Precinct 3 Commissioner Tom Ramsey said, “It’s a shame we’ve gotten to this point. I’ve had questions about this contract, which I included as a court agenda item on the very day it was canceled. While they remain unanswered “there’s still a lot of work to be done. Distrust in government is not what our constituents deserve. I’m hopeful the courts will find answers, so that we can begin to restore faith and integrity in Harris County again.”

As part of the investigation, officials seized phones, laptops, and desktops for Dunn, Nader and Triantaphyllis.

Whenever the bid was finally open to the public, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and two other groups also submitted proposals to be considered.

Dunn, Nader, and Triantaphyllis were on the five-person committee tasked with scoring the proposals.

Last month, Hidalgo said irrespective of the investigation, as part of a recent review of the county’s purchasing procedures, “No office will have staff members on selection committees going forward.”

The committee scored UT Health Science Center at Houston the highest with 46.8% followed by Elevate strategies with 40.4%, according to investigators. That raised some concerns among commissioners.

A review cited in the search warrant said UT Health was passed upon because the county was not happy with its work on other projects.

“In a text between Dunn, Nader, and Triantaphyllis on May 7, 2021, Dunn asked Triantaphyllis if he could ‘make the outreach RFP meeting that’s happening now?’ Triantaphyllis replied, ‘No. Take it away. And do not let UT get it,’ “according to a search warrant.

Harrison said although the affidavits indicate UT scored better than Elevate Strategies, that was actually just the score for the initial round.

“In any competitive bid process, there are multiple rounds. First round is usually a written proposal. The best of those bids comes in for a formal presentation. It was at that point we start to see the difference between Elevate and UT from maybe an accountability standpoint in that UT did not show up for their first presentation round, “Harrison said. “Here you have a vendor who has not shown up for the next round, who’s also managing another project within the county. It’s not going very well. There are some rumblings that maybe we need to make a change on that account. It’s almost like a reference check if you will, at that point and as you’re evaluating, we’re talking about an outreach campaign by knocking, going into underserved communities, Elevate came out ahead.

Moving forward, Harrison said the county is implementing changes to how documents are named to ensure potential vendors for county contracts aren’t sent RFPs before they’re public, especially by mistake.

“(This case) was human error, the wrong document was sent. Now we have a practice. There’s a practice on how we do that to ensure we’re sending the right document. Look at the document name, thinks like that can make a huge difference in these types of situations, “she said.

Harrison said there have been no staffing changes as a result of the search warrants.

“We are not rushing to any sort of judgment because we know there was no manipulation of this bidding process,” she said.

For the latest investigations, follow Ted on Facebook and Twitter.

Have a tip for Ted Oberg? A problem to solve? Get in touch with us on our tip page, or send a tip below. (On mobile? You can open our form by tapping here.)

Copyright © 2022 KTRK-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.